Why is that every time somebody posts any controversy related to RSSB, it is deleted from this page? Are we trying to make this page an official propaganda (or newsletter) of RSSB? There are ex-followers, who followed this faith for more than 30 years and now left this faith as they got disillusioned. This is wikipedia and not RSSB's official newsletter. Please provide "any definition of religion" from a reputed source and prove your point, instead of making conjectures! -Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.35.156.11 ( talk) 21:55, 25 February 2011 (UTC) Why only one sided view on this page By any definition of the word, "religion", it is. I don't understand the arguments claiming RSSB is not a religion. So, I think one should not use a term like religion this mat. Goal of life which is nothing but to unite with the master.Īnd we never profess ourselves to be sikhs.
#Rssb satsang beas satsang for nri how to
Our master teaches us the path of sant mat and how to reach the ultimate
I think you are mixing SANT MAT with religions like HINDUISM, SIKHISM Lane has additional information on this lineage, as he was an initiate of a Beas Guru named Charan Singh (guru). I started this article so that people interested in RSSB can create a proper article instead of changing the Sant Mat article to look like RSSB is Sant Mat, when most of the objective activity (books, Gurus, disciples) have long ago abandoned the Beas line. 11 This article reads like a pamphlet for the religion.
0 kommentar(er)
